January 22, 2008
Expressive Processing: An Experiment in Blog-Based Peer Review
Expressive Processing is the name of my forthcoming book about digital fictions and computer games, scheduled for publication next year by the MIT Press. Now is the time, in traditional academic publishing, when the press sends the manuscript out for peer review — anonymous commentary by a few scholars that guides the final revisions (and decisions). As Jeff Young reports in the Chronicle of Higher Education today, we’ve decided to do something a little different with Expressive Processing: asking the Grand Text Auto community to participate in an open, blog-based peer review.
Blogging has already changed how I work as a scholar and creator of digital media. Reading blogs started out as a way to keep up with the field between conferences — and I soon realized that blogs also contain raw research, early results, and other useful information that never gets presented at conferences. But, of course, that’s just the beginning. We founded Grand Text Auto, in 2003, for an even more important reason: blogs can create community. And the communities around blogs can be much more open and welcoming than those at conferences and festivals, drawing in people from industry, universities, the arts, and the general public. Interdisciplinary conversations happen on blogs that are more diverse and sustained than any I’ve seen in person.
Given that ours is a field in which major expertise is located outside the academy (like many other fields, from 1950s cinema to Civil War history) the Grand Text Auto community has been invaluable for my work. In fact, while writing the manuscript for Expressive Processing I found myself regularly citing blog posts and comments, both from Grand Text Auto and elsewhere. Now I’m excited to take the blog/manuscript relationship to the next level, through an open peer review of the manuscript on the blog.
This project started when Doug Sery, my editor at the MIT Press, brought up the question of who would peer review the Expressive Processing manuscript. I immediately realized that the peer review I most wanted was from the community around Grand Text Auto. I said this to Doug, who is a GTxA reader, and he was enthusiastic. Next I contacted Ben Vershbow at the Institute for the Future of the Book to see if we could adapt their CommentPress tool for use in an ongoing blog conversation. Ben not only agreed, but also became a partner in conceptualizing, planning, and producing the project. With the ball rolling, I asked the Committee on Research of UC San Diego’s Academic Senate for some support (which they generously provided) and approached Jeremy Douglass, of our newly-formed Software Studies initiative, who also became a core collaborator — especially (and appropriately) for the software-related aspects.
As for the book itself, Expressive Processing engages projects from the history of story, character, and play in digital media — from artificial intelligence research to mainstream computer games. It introduces a framework for understanding digital media, which serves as the basis for interpretations of the processes that drive these works, not just the surface outputs seen by audience members. This approach produces a series of lessons for creators and critics of digital media — as well as broader lessons about the software systems that we must increasingly engage in order to understand our evolving society.
Obviously, those are some ambitious aims, and I’m looking forward to hearing your thoughts and suggestions over the coming weeks. In particular, at the most basic level, please let me know if I get anything wrong. The project is very interdisciplinary and I know some of you are experts in areas where I’m still learning. More generally, please let me know what you think of the arguments. Are there further points calling out to be made? Are there elements that should be clarified or removed? Are there other projects or writings that I should be sure to engage — either for this book or my future thinking? Also, I hope GTxA people will feel free to offer thoughts that aren’t specific suggestions for me. If Expressive Processing gets you thinking about something new, I’d be glad to hear about it!
Finally, I’m interested to know what people think of the blog-based peer review process itself. While the future posts in GTxA’s “expressive-processing” category will be the best place to discuss the specifics of the book, this page seems like a good place to begin meta-discussion. Do you think you’ll participate? What kind of feedback would you like to offer? Feel free to share thoughts here or just start by commenting on the manuscript. The Expressive Processing project launches today — and will continue each weekday for about ten weeks. I’m looking forward to it.
January 22nd, 2008 at 4:47 am
[…] of Noah Wardrip-Fruin’s peer-review experiment: Noah’s publishing his book manuscript, Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies, in a modified version of CommentPress on the Grand Text Auto blog, at the same time his editor, […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 4:53 am
[…] of Noah Wardrip-Fruin’s peer-review experiment: Noah’s publishing his book manuscript, Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies, in a modified version of CommentPress on the Grand Text Auto blog, at the same time his editor, […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 10:27 am
[…] if:book has a very interesting post on a relatively new blog with a very new idea, blog reviewing before publication of a new text on digital media. the post can be found here and outlines the program along with comparing it to other blogs with similar goals. This could prove to be a very exciting project which could take us one step closer to finding a path for publishers in this digital age. The blog itself, Grand Text Auto can be found here. […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 10:34 am
I think opening the peer review up to the GTA community is a wonderful and generous move. Like many great ideas, now that you’ve done it, it seems like such a natural step. I’m excited to see what happens.
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:57 pm
[…] Original post by cogdog […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 2:01 pm
[…] Press has authorized what is probably one of the first blog-based peer reviews for a forthcoming book by Noah Wardrip-Fruin, digital media writer, artist, and professor of […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 3:08 pm
[…] Original post by cogdog […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 3:32 pm
[…] Noah Wardrip-Fruin] An exciting new experiment begins today, one which ties together many of the threads begun in our earlier “networked book” […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 9:22 pm
Adam, thanks, I appreciate it!
The move is largely inspired by how much I’ve already learned by being part of the GTxA community. I’m glad it all worked out to take this next step, and I hope our experimentation (and tool development) here will pave the way for future work in this area.
January 22nd, 2008 at 10:12 pm
[…] Review a Gaming Text Via Blog; Read a Classic for Free Noah Waldrip-Fruin is embarking upon a grand experiment this week by having his latest book peer-reviewed via blog. Waldrip-Fruin, over at UC San Diego, is […]
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:15 am
[…] Noah Wardrip-Fruin’s introduction to the experiment – The Institute for the Future of the Book’s introduction – Coverage in The Chronicle of […]
January 23rd, 2008 at 7:52 am
That does really say something about the readership of a blog when you can tap into them as “collective experts.” Viva (quality) crowdsourced content!
I’m really eager to see what comes from this, the move is a step towards bringing down some of the walls between the academy and the rest of the world. Good work Noah!
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:49 am
Noah, is it possible to move the trackbacks in the comments on these posts to another section? They are muddying up the waters by being combined with the comments, in this case.
January 23rd, 2008 at 10:36 am
[…] Link: http://grandtextauto.org/2008/01/22/expressive-processing-an-experiment-in-blog-based-peer-review/ […]
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Ian, good question. At first I’d looked at it as a feature — bringing in the other main method by which people comment on blogs. But now I think you’re right. I’ll see if we can adjust the CommentPress code (perhaps this coming weekend) so that Trackbacks are a separate category from full-page comments, but still visible in the CP environment.
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:32 pm
What’s with this strange floating comment box? Is there any way for me to go back to the old way of reading comments?
January 23rd, 2008 at 7:39 pm
[…] Grand Text Auto » Expressive Processing: An Experiment in Blog-Based Peer Review Very cool ground breaking experiment and an excellent example of the Institute of the Future of the Book’s WordPress plugin CommentPress. (tags: blog scholarship) […]
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:53 pm
Malcolm, the good news is that all the other posts on GTxA are still (and will continue to be) the way you prefer. But this box allows paragraph-level commenting on the Expressive Processing posts, which I think may be quite valuable, so it’s here to stay for this part of the blog activity.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:55 pm
Thanks Greg! Yes, it definitely says something about the people who read and write here. The years of positive experiences with this group inspired the project.
January 24th, 2008 at 8:48 am
[…] assistant professor in communication at UC-San Diego, and the blog in question is Grand Text Auto. Here’s a link to the blog post where Wardrip-Fruin kicks things off. And there are some other links in the article to sites like if:book. Actually, the Future of the […]
January 24th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
as the acquiring editor for noah’s book (and a long-time admirer of his work), i found noah’s suggestion that we put the first draft of his manuscript on-line for public comment at the same time i sent it out for peer-review an excellent idea and one that i was quite happy to participate in. in my mind, this has always been an experiment in new forums of communication, not a competition, so i’m amused (but, at the same time, disappointed) that the “blogosphere” already seems to be focusing on a perceived tension based solely, i believe, on the title of the chronicle of higher education article. nonetheless, i am very interested in seeing how this crowd-sourcing will affect noah’s manuscript. my primary concern has always been to make sure that The MIT Press publishes the best books possible and if this process will help Noah achieve that goal then i will deem it a success.
January 25th, 2008 at 3:21 am
[…] who is a professor at UC San Diego, is asking readers to do an open review at the paragraph level using CommentPress. It’ll give you a chance not only to get a read on what looks to be ain […]
January 25th, 2008 at 2:14 pm
I think it is really neat that you are opening your book to blog-based review. My students comment on my blog posts as well as each other comments. The idea of being able to comment by paragraph is super cool!
January 25th, 2008 at 2:17 pm
I would love to participate. As our world becomes more digital, it is essential for our classrooms to be digital. Meaning, teachers must increase their digital knowledge and your book sounds like a great place to begin.
January 25th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Once upon a time, this blog had posts signed by their authors at the _bottom_ of the post. I griped about this, as I always do when I come across it, because 99 times out of 100 the first paragraph uses a first-person pronoun of totally unclear referent. Author’s names belong at the top.
In a later revamp of the site layout, the author’s name was placed at the top.
In this current revamped layout, the author of this blog post is listed neither at the top NOR at the bottom (in Firefox, at least). I can’t tell at all from the blog whose book is forthcoming, except by clicking through to the Chronicle of HE article and reading it there. (Well, ok, it was also visible in the trackbacks.)
January 25th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
Er, I should clarify: that’s on this page alone, e.g. coming through from an RSS feed. The summary front page obviously still has the author names on it.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:43 am
Sean, you’re absolutely right. I’ll add that to the list of things we should change, as we adapt CommentPress for use in an ongoing blog.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:55 am
Thanks Dega. I hope we see many more experiments in this area.
January 26th, 2008 at 11:00 am
Yes, while it’s amusing to characterize this as a “death match” between the current academic publishing processes and some new possibilities, and it will be interesting to compare the results of the two, the fact is that I think both will help make this a better book. Doug, Ben, Jeremy, and I are all enthusiastic about the experiment and interested to see what we learn. There’s no hostility here.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:59 am
[…] Text Auto, a group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry and art, has recently launched an interesting blogging experiment that may take blogging and publishing to the next level. Noah Wardrip-Fruin is putting the […]
January 31st, 2008 at 3:55 pm
[…] Grand Text Auto » Expressive Processing: An Experiment in Blog-Based Peer Review – Noah Wadrip-Fruin’s new book, Expressive Processing, is now available for peer review on Grand Text Auto. This is very exciting, and I am eager to read and participate. Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. […]
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Just found out about this process today, looks like a good way to extend the public peer review model. How do you see the process improving/learning from McKenzie Wark’s public review approach?
February 4th, 2008 at 8:08 am
Good question. I was drawn into the digital media field, in part, by the ideas of Ted Nelson and Doug Engelbart. Part of what impressed me about the Gamer Theory project was how it made good on one of Engelbart’s key ideas — networked groups being able to respond to each other’s writings in a fine-grained manner (addressable paragraphs, sections, etc).
As I say in this page’s post, when my editor at MIT Press asked who I thought would be good to have peer review my manuscript, I realized I wanted the blog community discussing digital media, and especially the group around Grand Text Auto. I also wanted them to have the addressability provided by CommentPress, and that’s one of the close connections with Gamer Theory.
A couple differences from the Gamer Theory project have come up in many of my conversations. One is that this is being done in collaboration with an academic press. Among other things, this means the project is taking place in parallel with a traditional, blind, small-group academic peer review. I think it will be quite interesting to compare the two forms of response. Second, this project is being done in collaboration with existing online communities, which predate the project and will continue afterward. In particular, it is taking place at this blog, and taking a blog-like form (new material posted regularly, comments and trackbacks, etc). Given how much I’ve already gained from being part of blogging communities, I very much wanted to do the review this way.
February 27th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
[…] Noah Wardrip-Fruin over at Grant Text Auto, is experimenting with blog-based, serialized, community peer review. Noah’s book, Expressive Processing (one of a increasingly large number of texts laying claim […]
March 5th, 2008 at 9:45 am
[…] for Health, Knowledge, Fame: Grand Text Auto has a really interesting experiment going in blog-based peer review. Graphic Engine offers some […]
April 10th, 2008 at 12:28 am
[…] a Noah Wardrip-Fruin, al blog Grand Text Auto en el que se aloja y a su futuro libro Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies, para lo cual el autor ha contado con la […]
April 24th, 2008 at 3:56 am
[…] hónapja nagyobb újságokat is megjárta a hír, hogy egy frissen készülő játék-kötőjel-elmélet könyv kéziratát fejezetenként közreadnak, hogy a Grand Text Auto akadémikus gémerekből álló közönsége […]
April 24th, 2008 at 7:53 am
Hi, Noah. This is indeed an exciting and forward-thinking project. I had originally wanted to do something like this for my dissertation project, but lacked the technological means to make it happen.
I have the students in my Writing for the Web course looking at the project now, so maybe it will inspire some of them to follow your precedent with their own research.
Good luck!
April 25th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Thanks – and glad to have you here commenting! I have a copy of your Dungeons & Desktops that I’ve been meaning to blog about since GDC.
My manuscript for Expressive Processing has to go to the press pretty soon, but I’m hoping you’ll have a chance to share your thoughts on my “Computer Game Fictions” chapter before then. And then I’ll finally get back to meaningful blogging on other topics :-)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:55 am
[…] CommentPress is blogware developed by the Institute for the Future of the Book. Currently it is available as a WordPress Theme. WRT’s Jeremy Douglass was instrumental in adapting the software for use in the experimental (and successful) blog-based peer review of Noah Wardrip-Fruin’s manuscript Expressive Processing, forth coming from MIT Press. […]
April 29th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
[…] course, other examples of what might be called the third or tertiary orality (e.g., expressive processing) suggest another mode of interaction, which attends more to feedback than…hmmm…I want […]
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 pm
This is a quite belated comment, but the online peer review of Real World Haskell (example chapter) has what I think might be a more readable solution. There’s an AJAXy comment area below every paragraph that starts collapsed by default, and can be expanded to view the comments on that paragraph. An added benefit of that style is that the main text is now a normal width instead of in a narrow column to the left.
May 23rd, 2008 at 10:03 am
[…] mark on Expressive Processing: An Experiment in Blog-Based Peer Review […]
June 5th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
[…] Expressive Processing: An Experiment in Blog-Based Peer Review – Noah Waldrip Fruin on Grand Text Auto […]
January 27th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
[…] Expressive Processing, an experiment in blog-based peer review […]
May 12th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
[…] Four Surprises by Noah Wardrip-Fruin · May 12, 2009, 3:20 pm 1Last year we undertook an experiment here: simultaneously sending the manuscript for Expressive Processing out for traditional, […]